8.RP.1.1
edited
Katie:
Pro- It was very interesting to read
Con- NO PICTURES!!!!
Tasia:
Pro- It was really int…
Katie:
Pro- It was very interesting to read
Con- NO PICTURES!!!!
Tasia:
Pro- It was really interesting. Very informational.
Con- I would've liked to see some pictures.
8.SI.1.3
edited
Michelle
MLA Citation of Source:
"Drinking Water." The New Book of Knowledge. Grolier …
Michelle
MLA Citation of Source:
"Drinking Water." The New Book of Knowledge. Grolier Online, 2012. Web. 14 Mar. 2012
Evaluation of Source:
Website Extension:My internet source ends with .com, so I know that my source is related to a commercial site. This helps me determine that it is (or is not) a reliable source because commercial sites are reliable most of the time.
Date: The date was close to the date I used the website, so that means the information is resent.
Reputation: I didn't see anything bad about the website, so the reputation of the website is good.
Author: The author of the article was professional and not bias.
Consistency: This source had a lot of information about the subject I was researching. It was consistent.
Conclusion:
In the end I was able to determine that this site was reliable based on these five levels of evaluation. I examined each criteria and believe this source was really reliable because it did not give me false information. It basically had the same information as other sources I searched. I like this source because it was easy to use.
8.SI.1.2
edited
Michelle Soriano
MLA Citation of Source:
"Drinking Water." The New Book of Knowledge. …
Michelle Soriano
MLA Citation of Source:
"Drinking Water." The New Book of Knowledge. Grolier Online, 2012. Web. 14 Mar. 2012
Evaluation of Source:
Website Extension:My internet source ends with .com, so I know that my source is related to a commercial site. This helps me determine that it is (or is not) a reliable source because commercial sites are reliable most of the time.
Date: The date was close to the date I used the website, so that means the information is resent.
Reputation: I didn't see anything bad about the website, so the reputation of the website is good.
Author: The author of the article was professional and not bias.
Consistency: This source had a lot of information about the subject I was researching. It was consistent.
Conclusion:
In the end I was able to determine that this site was reliable based on these five levels of evaluation. I examined each criteria and believe this source was really reliable because it did not give me false information. It basically had the same information as other sources I searched. I like this source because it was easy to use.
8.SI.1.1
edited
... Evaluation of Source:
Website Extension:My internet source ends with .com, so I know that my …
...
Evaluation of Source:
Website Extension:My internet source ends with .com, so I know that my source is related to a commercial site. This helps me determine that it is (or is not) a reliable source because commercial sites are reliable most of the time.
Date: (Here you will evaluateThe date was close to the publication date of your site and ifI used the website, so that matters to what you are researching at this time)
Reputation:(Here you will evaluatemeans the information is resent.
Reputation: I didn't see anything bad about the website, so the reputation of the source/site and if itwebsite is a credible one that you consider reliable)
Author:(Here you will evaluate if thegood.
Author: The author is an expert, are they biased, and/or do they stand a chance for personal gain. How does that effectof the source? Is it reliable?)article was professional and not bias.
Consistency: How does this resource apply/relate to your topic?
(Here you will evaluate the consistency and relevencyThis source had a lot of the information you found on this site/source. Did you verifyabout the same information with other reliable sources? Which ones?)subject I was researching. It was consistent.
Conclusion:
...
believe this source...... (completesource was really reliable because it did not give me false information. It basically had the explanation by summarizing how you know yoursame information as other sources I searched. I like this source is reliable. Only 3-4 sentences needed).because it was easy to use.
